Top Stories

Assaduddin Oyesi is angry at the order to wipe out the Gianfapi Mosque and says the court opens the way for violence against Muslims


AIMIM chief Asaduddin Oyesi said on Saturday that the court’s recent order on the survey of certain areas of the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri complex “opens the way for the bloodshed of the Rath Yatras and violence against Muslims in the 1980s and 1990s”. Denouncing the Varanasi court’s order, Asaduddin Owaisi said in a tweet, “This order to clear the Gyanvapi Mosque in Kashi is a clear violation of the Places of Worship Act 1991, which prohibits changing religious places.”

Asaduddin Al-Owaisi said, “The Supreme Court in Ayodhya’s ruling held that the law protects the secular features of the Indian political system which is one of the essential features of the constitution.” Asaduddin Owaisi’s statement came a day after a court commissioner surveyed and photographed the building in Varanasi, Kashi Vishwanath Temple and Gyanvapi Mosque as per the court order.

Related news

The case of the Gianfabe Mosque
Rakhi Singh, Lakshmi Devi, Sita Sahu and others from Delhi petitioned for permission to perform the puja and daily rituals at Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Lord Hanuman and Nandi located on the outer wall of the Gyanvapi Mosque. He had submitted his petition to the court on April 18, 2021.

After hearing the petition, the Varanasi Civil Magistrate’s Court (Senior Division) has ordered Ravi Kumar Dewakar to photograph Shringar Gauri temple in Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi mosque complex and other places after Eid and before 10 May. Let us tell you that on May 6 and May 7, videography and survey were scheduled to take place inside the mosque premises.

A survey of every brick of the Shringar Gauri temple structure
At 3 pm on Friday afternoon, there was a commotion around the Gyanvapi mosque located in the Kashi Vishwanath Dham complex when the two parties led by the commissioner of the court and their preachers arrived to the west of the mosque, and entered through the main entrance of the building. Daham (Gate No. 4). The four directions of Gianfabe were converted into police camps. Entry to worshipers from the main gate is closed. The survey was initiated by Dr. Sunil Kumar Verma, CEO of the already existing Vishwanath Temple and ADM City Gulab Chandra, who arrived as the representative of the DM,. The commissioner of the court began the investigation with two of his fellow lawyers, and the investigation lasted nearly three hours. There was a lot of turmoil outside the gate during the commissioning procedure. There was a pool on both sides.

Light the torch to see inside the tree
In the first stage, the commissioner of the court investigated the case of Shringar Gauri and the surrounding platform. Videography was taken from each brick to the clay and stone. Over 70 photos were taken within a 40-foot radius. The commissioner of the court saw the situation by lighting a torch inside Shringar Gauri’s table. Feel the color in the stick by touching it with your hand. The inscriptions on the western wall of the mosque were carefully filmed on video. Also saw the common part of the dome and the back wall. During the survey, the commissioner of the court along with his fellow lawyers also wrote a report on the facts and the situation between them. Scanning continued continuously for about three hours.

Protesting the entry of the commissioner of the court
In the Gyanvapi episode, Abhaynath Yadav, an advocate for the opposition Anjuman Mosque Order Committee, said that we are not satisfied with the court commissioner’s action. You will apply to change it in court. He claimed that the commissioner of the court was scraping everything with his finger, while the court had no order to scrape or dig anything out. So I am not satisfied with this procedure. The lawyer said that after examining the Shringar Gauri platform, the commissioner of the court tried to enter by opening the entrance to the Gyanvapi Mosque. We protested that. The lawyer said, there is no court order that you have to videotape inside the barrier, but the attorney general said I have an order to open the lock and videotape inside.

There was a commotion as soon as the judges arrived
During the survey, there was an uproar among the defenders present immediately as soon as the entrance to the Dham opened for High Court Justice DY Chandrachud and Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court Rajesh Bindal at around 3.30pm. The administration and police officers left the chair and stood up. Other lawyers, including the commissioner of the court, paused the survey for a few moments. After giving a token salute, he began scanning. In the end the temple management gave prasad to all.

The Shringar Gauri case first reached the court in 1995.
For the first time in 1995, it came to court to hear the Shringar Gauri case. Dr Suhanlal Arya, a resident of Surajkund in Laksa, had asked the court to appoint a commissioner to the court and to conduct a survey. In 1996, the court appointed a commissioner of the court and ordered action by the commission. Dr. says. Suhanlal said the commissioner of the court informed both parties and called for the survey on May 18, 1996. During the survey, a large number of people who came on behalf of the opposition started to protest. Because of this, the survey cannot be completed. Until then it was a Friday and the prayers of the worshipers gathered. Subsequently, Rakhi Singh, Laxmi Devi, Manju Vyas, Sita Sahu and Rika Pathak from Delhi filed a joint petition in the Court of First Instance of Civil Judges Ravi Kumar Dewakar on August 18, 2021. Dr. Suhanlal is an attorney in this case. Listed Laxmi Devi in ​​the plaintiff is his wife. On April 8, 2022, the court appointed a commissioner of the court. The commissioner of the court notified the court to conduct the survey on April 19.

On April 18, the administration lodged an objection through a government attorney and demanded a ban on video and filming. On April 19, the opposition Anjuman Tanzania Mosques Committee filed a petition to the Supreme Court demanding that it be halted. The Supreme Court rejected the petition and upheld the lower court’s order. On April 20, the court also ended the hearing. On April 26, the Court of First Instance ordered the investigation proceedings after Eid. Under the order, the commissioner of the court began the survey on Friday. Plaintiff made Vishwanath Temple Trust, DM, Commissioner of Police, Anjuman Inazaniya Masajid Committee and Central Sunni Endowment Board as parties.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button